Hello! > If there are no dependent patches on list that are 2.5 candidate, I suggest > we just drop this one for the short term. > Is there something on list?
For 2.5, AFAIK, no. Unless Shlomo suddenly comes up with clean GICv3 implementation which could be quickly accepted. I wanted to upstream this now in order to forget about the problem and allow me and Shlomo to post cleaner series without the need to include preparations like this every time. > I have no objection to the obj-y solution medium term, as there are already > multiple users of the ARM CP API using > their obj-y privileges to access it. Ok, so decided. I will convert my code, test the build and send a small patch for this soon, perhaps today. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
