On 10/30/2015 06:14 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:56:21PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
  static uint64_t
  nvdimm_dsm_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
  {
-    return 0;
+    AcpiNVDIMMState *state = opaque;
+    MemoryRegion *dsm_ram_mr = &state->ram_mr;
+    NvdimmDsmIn *in;
+    GArray *out;
+    void *dsm_ram_addr;
+    uint32_t buf_size;
+
+    assert(memory_region_size(dsm_ram_mr) >= sizeof(NvdimmDsmIn));
+    dsm_ram_addr = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(dsm_ram_mr);
+
+    /*
+     * The DSM memory is mapped to guest address space so an evil guest
+     * can change its content while we are doing DSM emulation. Avoid
+     * this by copying DSM memory to QEMU local memory.
+     */
+    in = g_malloc(memory_region_size(dsm_ram_mr));
+    memcpy(in, dsm_ram_addr, memory_region_size(dsm_ram_mr));
+
+    le32_to_cpus(&in->revision);
+    le32_to_cpus(&in->function);
+    le32_to_cpus(&in->handle);
+
+    nvdimm_debug("Revision %#x Handler %#x Function %#x.\n", in->revision,
+                 in->handle, in->function);
+
+    out = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1);
+
+    if (in->revision != 0x1 /* Current we support DSM Spec Rev1. */) {
+        nvdimm_debug("Revision %#x is not supported, expect %#x.\n",
+                      in->revision, 0x1);
+        nvdimm_dsm_write_status(out, NVDIMM_DSM_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED);
+        goto exit;
+    }
+
+    /* Handle 0 is reserved for NVDIMM Root Device. */
+    if (!in->handle) {
+        nvdimm_dsm_root(in, out);
+        goto exit;
+    }
+
+    nvdimm_dsm_device(in, out);
+
+exit:
+    /* Write output result to dsm memory. */
+    memcpy(dsm_ram_addr, out->data, out->len);
+    memory_region_set_dirty(dsm_ram_mr, 0, out->len);

If you respin this series, please add this before the memcpy out:

   assert(out->len <= memory_region_size(dsm_ram_mr))

That way we can catch situations where too much output data was
generated by mistake.


Okay. If this patchset is okay to be merged, i will add this in
future development.

Thanks for your continuous and active review, Stefan!


Reply via email to