On 05/11/2015 14:44, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 5 November 2015 at 13:23, Christian Borntraeger > <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote: >> Maybe we should try to aim for a 3 month cadence for QEMU to reduce the >> pain of missing soft/hard freeze. -> maybe a topic for the next QEMU >> summit? > > We used to have 3 month releases, but I think we found that these > were too short: If you have about a month hardfreeze and a month > softfreeze then you only have a month of open feature development, > which seems pretty short to me.
It's short unless you assume that development goes on in private maintainer trees during hard freeze. It's always happened at least for the block layer, and probably for everything else. About 400 commits in 2.5 were authored before the 2.4 release. The main issue is that shorter cycles may mean fewer and bigger pull requests. It also means more awareness of conflicts is needed. We definitely lack the continuous integration infrastructure that is needed for that. Paolo
