On 5 November 2015 at 14:42, Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote: > Chicken & egg issue in that case because airlied (linux kernel drm > maintainer) asked to have the qemu changes merged before taking the > virtio-gpu pull request. So I had no other chance than creating the > patches with not-yet upstream virtio header changes ...
Hmm. If I'd realised that at the time I'd have pushed back on it. We should never take code that relies on upstream kernel ABI that hasn't been accepted by the maintainer yet. thanks - PMM
