On Wed, 26 May 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Frank Mehnert wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 May 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Frank Mehnert wrote:
> >>> I assume the correct condition would be '>= 0', that is
> >>>
> >>> ...
> >>> if ((s->tsr_retry >= 0) && (s->tsr_retry <= MAX_XMIT_RETRY)) {
> >>> s->tsr_retry++;
> >>> ...
> >> Makes sense, patch welcome.
> >
> > Attached.
>
> Signed-off, subject, and description please. And I would keep Stefano as
> the original author of this feature in CC. A cross-check by him might be
> good as we enable a code path that was apparently dead so far.
>
I think the patch is correct.
