On 11/11/2015 09:23 AM, Dong, Eddie wrote: >> - What's the plan for vhost? Userspace network in qemu is rather slow, most >> user will choose vhost. > [Dong, Eddie] Hi Jason: > How about we take staging approach? In general, COLO opens a door of > high performance HA solution, but it will take very long time to make > everything perfect. As for the network virtualization, I think we may start > from usage with moderate network bandwidth, like 1Gbps. Otherwise, the > performance of COLO may be not that good (of course, like David mentioned, > the worst case is same with periodic checkpoint). At the moment, how about we > start from in Qemu virtio network, and enhance for vhost case in future?
Yes, of course and it makes sense. Mentioning vhost here is to avoid re-inventing or abandoning some exist infrastructures. For example, thinking how netfiler can work with vhost from the beginning does not harm ... > > The good thing is that we get more people working on the patch series, > and glad to see UMU also joined the effort. Thanks and welcome... > > Thx Eddie Thanks
