On 11 November 2015 at 20:59, Marc-André Lureau
<marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>> On 10 November 2015 at 18:41, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 9 November 2015 at 17:50, Marc-André Lureau <mlur...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> I can imagine a test starting a server thread and 2 qemu instances
>>>> would take more than 5s on such configuration then.
>>>>
>>>> Could you try timing the test a few times to confirm this?
>>>
>>> petmay01@moonshot-dsg-11:~/qemu/build/all-a64$ time
>>> QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=i386-softmmu/qemu-system-i386
>>> QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img MALLOC_PERTURB_=${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$((RANDOM %
>>> 255 + 1))} gtester -k --verbose -m=quick tests/ivshmem-test
>>> TEST: tests/ivshmem-test... (pid=10893)
>>> /i386/ivshmem/single: OK
>>> /i386/ivshmem/pair: OK
>>> /i386/ivshmem/server: OK
>>> /i386/ivshmem/hotplug: OK
>>> /i386/ivshmem/memdev: OK
>>> PASS: tests/ivshmem-test
>>>
>>> real 0m11.945s
>>> user 0m11.020s
>>> sys 0m0.310s
>>>
>>> (almost all of the runtime seems to be in the "pair" subtest).
>>
>> This is now failing on practically every pull request I test.
>> Please post a patch to fix this test or disable it...
>
> This is the simplest patch I suggest for now.
That will still mean that trying the slow tests gives random
failures, so this still needs attention (ie raising the timeouts
to something that won't actually be hit), but I guess it will
solve my immediate problem. Can you send it to the list as
a proper patch, please?
thanks
-- PMM
