Hi Max:
On 11/21/2015 12:17 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
On 20.11.2015 10:35, Fam Zheng wrote:
Otherwise, a window flashes on my desktop (built with SDL). Other
iotest cases have that.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
---
tests/qemu-iotests/120 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/120 b/tests/qemu-iotests/120
index 9f13078..d899a3f 100755
--- a/tests/qemu-iotests/120
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/120
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ echo "{'execute': 'qmp_capabilities'}
{'execute': 'human-monitor-command',
'arguments': {'command-line': 'qemu-io drv \"write -P 42 0 64k\"'}}
{'execute': 'quit'}" \
- | $QEMU -qmp stdio -nodefaults \
+ | $QEMU -qmp stdio -nographic -nodefaults \
-drive
id=drv,if=none,file="$TEST_IMG",driver=raw,file.driver=$IMGFMT \
| _filter_qmp | _filter_qemu_io
$QEMU_IO -c 'read -P 42 0 64k' "$TEST_IMG" | _filter_qemu_io
This is the same patch as
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-11/msg00623.html,
but while both are correct, both need to fix 119, too, I think.
(And while I would be fine with merging this and then taking a follow-up
patch, I don't think we need to hurry for 2.5. Releases and iotests
don't really care about each other, other than that we should pass all
the iotests before a release unless we know what's wrong and don't care.)
thanks for your advice. I plan to fix 119 in a follow-up patch.
currently, 119 is notrun for s390x, and I hope to spend some time to
investigate it later.
Max