On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27:45AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > The "ICP" is a different object than the "XICS". For historical reasons, > we have a number of places where we name a variable "icp" while it contains > a XICSState pointer. There *is* an ICPState structure too so this makes > the code really confusing. > > This is a mechanical replacement of all those instances to use the name > "xics" instead. There should be no functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
Ah, good idea. I think I'll take this one independently as well.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
