On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:50:01 +0100
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> For x-data-plane=true, we create an iothread automatically for
> compatibility. Commit d21e877 ("iothread: include id in thread name")
> exposed that this iothread missed correct parenthood: fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
> index c42ddeb..c7e5668 100644
> --- a/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,9 @@ void virtio_blk_data_plane_create(VirtIODevice *vdev,
> VirtIOBlkConf *conf,
> object_initialize(&s->internal_iothread_obj,
> sizeof(s->internal_iothread_obj),
> TYPE_IOTHREAD);
> + object_property_add_child(OBJECT(conf), TYPE_IOTHREAD,
> + OBJECT(&s->internal_iothread_obj),
> + &error_abort);
> user_creatable_complete(OBJECT(&s->internal_iothread_obj),
> &error_abort);
> s->iothread = &s->internal_iothread_obj;
> }
Scratch that, does not work... (I thought I was hitting the other
segfault in the block backend processing...)
