Thomas Huth, on Fri 11 Dec 2015 14:43:42 +0100, wrote: > Anyway, it's IMHO a somewhat strange way to structure a patch ... maybe > it would be nicer to do it in one go instead (after splitting off the > arp_requested renaming)?
Please discuss about it with the people who asked for it. I won't revamp patches until what people prefer is settled. Personally I prefer the two-patch approach, since the first nicely shows what behavior change we have, and the second is a no-op patch, as can be seen with diff -w Samuel
