On 4 December 2015 at 16:52, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 4 December 2015 at 16:39, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> I don't think we've ever said "we should transition away from HWADDR_*", >>> but whether we should is an interesting question, which is why I asked. >>> Does retaining the format macros to go with the typedef give us >>> useful flexibility, or is it just confusing? >> >> I think it's confusing, but not enough to warrant a tree-wide search >> and replace. > > I think I agree :-) > > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > and I'll queue this in target-arm.next for 2.6.
Now in target-arm.next. I also did s/__FUNCTION__/__func__/ since checkpatch complains about it and we're touching these lines of code anyway. thanks -- PMM
