W dniu 21.12.2015 o 12:28, Peter Crosthwaite pisze:
> Subsystem prefix needed in commit subject (block: m25p80). Bring the
> mention of specific parts to the paragraph to shorten the subject.
I accidentally removed word m25p80 from all patches subject.
Sorry.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:57 AM,  <marcin.krzemin...@nokia.com> wrote:
>> From: Marcin Krzeminski <marcin.krzemin...@nokia.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Krzeminski <marcin.krzemin...@nokia.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/block/m25p80.c | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/block/m25p80.c b/hw/block/m25p80.c
>> index fbbfd1d..1a547ae 100644
>> --- a/hw/block/m25p80.c
>> +++ b/hw/block/m25p80.c
>> @@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ static const FlashPartInfo known_devices[] = {
>>
>>      { INFO("at45db081d",  0x1f2500,      0,  64 << 10,  16, ER_4K) },
>>
>> +    /* Atmel EEPROMS - it is assumed, that don't care bit in command */
>
> Multi-line comment should not stop and start again (no */).
Ok.
Thanks,
Marcin
>
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.pe...@gmail.com>
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
>> +    /* is set to 0. Block protection is not supported */
>> +    { INFO("at25128a-nonjedec", 0x0,     0,         1, 131072, WR_1) },
>> +    { INFO("at25256a-nonjedec", 0x0,     0,         1, 262144, WR_1) },
>> +
>>      /* EON -- en25xxx */
>>      { INFO("en25f32",     0x1c3116,      0,  64 << 10,  64, ER_4K) },
>>      { INFO("en25p32",     0x1c2016,      0,  64 << 10,  64, 0) },
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>>
>
>


Reply via email to