On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 09:29 PM, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote:
>>> On 06/01/2010 01:12 PM, Igor V. Kovalenko wrote:
>>>> + if ((env->pstate & PS_AM) && is_translating_asi(asi)) {
>>>> + addr &= 0xffffffffULL;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> I suggest that these be written instead as
>>>
>>> if (is_translating_asi(asi)) {
>>> addr = address_mask(addr);
>>> }
>>>
>>> That should allow you to remove some of the ifdefs.
>>
>> All address masking is done for sparc64 target only, sparc32 does not
>> have the notion of translating asi.
>
> Of course I know that.
>
>> I think it's better to do debug printf macro trick ...
>
> ... with no evidence. The compiler is happy to optimize away
> the entire if statement without having to resort to macros.
>
>> ... then but I see no real benefit at the moment.
>
> Avoiding ifdefs isn't a benefit?
I agree macros would make the code more tidy, perhaps it could swallow
both the check and the masking. The macro can be empty for Sparc32.
