On 01/06/2016 03:37 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Make sure that we include the value of dma_active in the migration stream.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>
> ---
>  hw/ide/macio.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ide/macio.c b/hw/ide/macio.c
> index 560c071..695d4d2 100644
> --- a/hw/ide/macio.c
> +++ b/hw/ide/macio.c
> @@ -518,11 +518,12 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps pmac_ide_ops = {
>  
>  static const VMStateDescription vmstate_pmac = {
>      .name = "ide",
> -    .version_id = 3,
> +    .version_id = 4,
>      .minimum_version_id = 0,
>      .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
>          VMSTATE_IDE_BUS(bus, MACIOIDEState),
>          VMSTATE_IDE_DRIVES(bus.ifs, MACIOIDEState),
> +        VMSTATE_BOOL(dma_active, MACIOIDEState),
>          VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
>      }
>  };
> 

Did you wind up ever observing this value to be non-zero when it was
written to the migration stream?

I really did think that we should be able to assume this was always
false due to how migration will drain all outstanding AIO, but maybe I
am mistaken.

--js

Reply via email to