Hi David, On 01/11/2016 03:45 AM, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 03:13:25PM +0000, Eric Auger wrote: >> qemu_fdt_setprop self-exists in case of error hence no need to check >> the returned value. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@linaro.org> > > This change is fine, but in general I'm disinclined to invest too much > in the qemu interfaces for manipulating flattened trees. > > I think our device tree manipulation in qemu is now complicated enough > that we should move towards using an unflattened (i.e. pointer based) > DT representation inside qemu, which is generally more suitable for > complex manipulation. OK. Is there any user-space library available for un-flattened tree manipulation? I only found references to kernel unflattened tree manipulations (drivers/of/fdt.c, include/linux/of.h) and dtc flattree.c.
Besides the indicated direction do I understand correctly that you do not reject the series? Best Regards Eric > > That would then get flattened into a blob for the guest in a single > pass at reset time. >
