Le 14/01/2016 10:37, Chen Gang a écrit : > > On 2016年01月14日 17:10, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> >> Le 14/01/2016 10:01, Chen Gang a écrit : >>> >>> I am not quite sure whether kernel always returns sizeof(int) (I guess, >>> it should be). >> >> it can be 1 only if len is 1, but this is managed below. >> > > Excuse me, I do not quite understand your meaning. > > For me, if we are sure lv is always 4 for SO_TYPE, we don't need this > patch. > > If lv may be 1 for SO_TYPE (it means val >> 8 may be zero), after call > host_to_target_sock_type, val >> 8 may be non-zero, theoretically. In > this case, we need modify lv to 4. > >>> For me, if you are sure, we can skip this patch. >> >> Does it fix something ? >> > > It is only theoretical, not real world, at present.
So I think we can skip it. Laurent