Hi, > My pending patches will also allow an anonymous base class, so that we > don't have to specify an intermediate AudiodevCommonOptions class. Not > a show-stopper, though. > > Overall looks rather sane (I think we've done the bulk of the reviewing > last summer), although I didn't read it closely enough for a R-b tag at > this time.
Yes. I was basically waiting for the qapi patches to land first. Which took quite a bit longer than I expected. v8 posted in December ... So, what is the status and the plan here? I still would prefer to have the qapi bits go in first, then merge the audio work on top of this. But I also don't want wait forever, I'd like to see the audio bits finally land in qemu 2.6. cheers, Gerd
