On 15 January 2016 at 17:03, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote: > I've just run through some SPARC32 tests with this patchset applied - > testing a savevm/loadvm pair pre-patch and post-patch, and then a few > random tests with various OSs at random points during boot and no > regressions here, so: > > Tested-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>
Thanks. > The only minor nit I could see during review was that both patches 7 and > 8 bump the VMState revision for SPARC64, and given that before the last > patch in the set nothing works then is it just worth bumping once to > version 8 in patch 7 and let that be it? My general feeling is that there isn't a significant shortage of positive integers that would lead us to want to conserve them :-) If you prefer only bumping once you can do that when you apply the patches to your target-sparc queue if you like. thanks -- PMM
