Am 19.01.2016 um 09:57 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > On 19.01.2016 00:16, Eric Blake wrote: > >preserving semantics of those extra_data bytes). We > >have enough room for future extension, and that's good e > > Ok, so, what should go to the spec? Current wording is ok? Just > delete "Type-specific": > > + > + 20 - 23: extra_data_size > + Size of type-specific extra data. > + > + For now, as no extra data is defined, extra_data_size is > + reserved and must be zero. > + > + variable: Extra data for the bitmap.
Please be explicit that if extra_data_size is non-zero, the bitmap must not be used (i.e. specify the incompatible-feature-bit-like behaviour). Kevin