On 01/15/2016 03:18 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 14 January 2016 at 14:27, Christian Borntraeger > <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote: >> Ping? >> >> On 12/03/2015 01:14 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> From: David Hildenbrand <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> >>> This patch provides the name of the architecture in the target.xml >>> if available. >>> >>> This allows the remote gdb to detect the target architecture on its >>> own - so there is no need to specify it manually (e.g. if gdb is >>> started without a binary) using "set arch *arch_name*". >>> >>> The name of the architecture is provided by a callback that can >>> be implemented by all architectures. The arm implementation has >>> special handling for iwmmxt and returns arm otherwise. This can >>> be extended if necessary. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> >>> [rework to use a callback] >>> --- >>> v1->v2: replace the fixed string with a callback >>> >>> gdbstub.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- >>> include/qom/cpu.h | 3 +++ >>> target-arm/cpu.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>> target-arm/cpu64.c | 6 ++++++ >>> target-ppc/translate_init.c | 10 ++++++++++ >>> target-s390x/cpu.c | 6 ++++++ >>> 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > (at least for the generic and ARM related bits).
Ok, so I will take that and send it via the s390/kvm tree? Well, Conny will probably do the next round. Christian
