On 01/22/2016 05:32 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> On 01/22/2016 04:36 PM, zhanghailiang wrote:
>> If the filter is disabled, don't go through it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  include/net/filter.h | 5 +++++
>>  net/net.c            | 4 ++++
>>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/filter.h b/include/net/filter.h
>> index 9ed5ec6..d797ee4 100644
>> --- a/include/net/filter.h
>> +++ b/include/net/filter.h
>> @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ ssize_t qemu_netfilter_pass_to_next(NetClientState 
>> *sender,
>>                                      int iovcnt,
>>                                      void *opaque);
>>  
>> +static inline bool qemu_need_skip_netfilter(NetFilterState *nf)
>> +{
>> +    return nf->enabled ? false : true;
>> +}
>> +
>>  void netfilter_print_info(NetFilterState *nf, char *output_str, int size);
>>  
>>  #endif /* QEMU_NET_FILTER_H */
>> diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
>> index 87de7c0..ec43105 100644
>> --- a/net/net.c
>> +++ b/net/net.c
>> @@ -581,6 +581,10 @@ static ssize_t filter_receive_iov(NetClientState *nc,
>>      NetFilterState *nf = NULL;
>>  
>>      QTAILQ_FOREACH(nf, &nc->filters, next) {
>> +        /* Don't go through filter if it is off */
>> +        if (qemu_need_skip_netfilter(nf)) {
>> +            continue;
>> +        }
>>          ret = qemu_netfilter_receive(nf, direction, sender, flags, iov,
>>                                       iovcnt, sent_cb);
>>          if (ret) {
>>
> qemu_netfilter_pass_to_next() shoule also be updated.

Then let's better move it to qemu_netfiler_receive().

>
> Thanks
> Wen Congyang
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to