On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> We already have the named config mechanism. I wonder if building a BIOS >> option ROM for a real NIC is sufficiently specialised that it would make >> sense to have a CONFIG=rom or CONFIG=minimal named configuration. > > Maybe name the configs "rom64k" or "rom128k", to make clear they are > stripped down to keep the size below a certain limit? > > cheers, > Gerd
How common is it to build EFI roms, compared to building ipxe.efi or snponly.efi? On IRC, roms is quite rare topic compared to non rom builds, but maybe that's because those that build roms don't have that many questions. My preferred default would be IPv6 enabled for EFI but not PCBIOS, but focus on the most frequent build/usecase. Adding "rom64k" and "rom128k" sounds like a good basics to then disable features from the normal? /Christian
