On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:07:48PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > The GThread coroutine backend was a portable coroutine implementation. > Over the years all platforms got their own optimized coroutine > implementations and nothing uses the GThread backend anymore. > > In fact, ./configure mentions the GThread backend doesn't work but might > be useful for debugging. Since GDB macros were added to ease debugging > of ucontext coroutines, there seems little point in keeping a broken > backend around. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> > --- > configure | 19 ++--- > util/coroutine-gthread.c | 198 > ----------------------------------------------- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 212 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 util/coroutine-gthread.c
NACK Alex Bennee pointed out that ThreadSanitizer needs the GThread backend because it cannot cope with stack switching. Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature