On 09.02.2016 22:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Thanks for your reviews so far!  I have integrated the rest of comments,
> the only remaining question for patches 1-3 is about srand() and rand().

I personally don't mind whether you use rand(), g_random_int_range() or
g_rand_int_range() here, but of course, the ..._range() functions seem
to fit more naturally here.
I just think that if you use rand() or g_random_int_range(), the rng
should be seeded from the main() function, not from the slirp code.

 Thomas


Reply via email to