On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:26:53PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:36:12PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 02/09/16 17:22, John Snow wrote:
> > > On 02/09/2016 10:52 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:20:47PM -0500, John Snow wrote:
> > >>> On 02/08/2016 08:14 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > >>>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 07:25:07PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > >>>>>> + aml_append(fdi,
> > >>>>>> + aml_int(cylinders - 1)); /* Maximum Cylinder Number */
> > >>>>> this puts uint64_t(-1) in AML i.e. cylinders == 0 and overflow
> > >>>>> happens here
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> CCing Jon
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I guess this is the effect of John's fdc rework. I used to think zero
> > >>>> geometry was impossible at the time this patch was developed.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I wonder if it hasn't been fixed already by
> > >>>>
> > >>>> commit fd9bdbd3459e5b9d51534f0747049bc5b6145e07
> > >>>> Author: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>
> > >>>> Date: Wed Feb 3 11:28:55 2016 -0500
> > >>>>
> > >>>> fdc: fix detection under Linux
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, hopefully solved on my end. The geometry values for an empty disk
> > >>> are not well defined (they certainly don't have any *meaning*) so if you
> > >>> are populating tables based on an empty drive, I just hope you also have
> > >>> the mechanisms needed to update said tables when the media changes.
> > >>
> > >> I don't. At the time the patch was developed there basically were no
> > >> mechanisms to update the geometry at all (and this was what you patchset
> > >> addressed, in particular, wasn't it?) so I didn't care.
> > >>
> > >
> > > That's not true.
> > >
> > > You could swap different 1.44MB-class diskettes for other geometries,
> > > check this out:
> > >
> > > static const FDFormat fd_formats[] = {
> > > /* First entry is default format */
> > > /* 1.44 MB 3"1/2 floppy disks */
> > > { FDRIVE_DRV_144, 18, 80, 1, FDRIVE_RATE_500K, },
> > > { FDRIVE_DRV_144, 20, 80, 1, FDRIVE_RATE_500K, },
> > > { FDRIVE_DRV_144, 21, 80, 1, FDRIVE_RATE_500K, },
> > > { FDRIVE_DRV_144, 21, 82, 1, FDRIVE_RATE_500K, },
> > > { FDRIVE_DRV_144, 21, 83, 1, FDRIVE_RATE_500K, },
> > > { FDRIVE_DRV_144, 22, 80, 1, FDRIVE_RATE_500K, },
> > > { FDRIVE_DRV_144, 23, 80, 1, FDRIVE_RATE_500K, },
> > > { FDRIVE_DRV_144, 24, 80, 1, FDRIVE_RATE_500K, },
> > > ...
> > >
> > > You absolutely could get different sector and track counts before my
> > > patchset.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Now if it actually has to be fully dynamic it's gonna be more
> > >> involved...
> > >>
> > >>> What do the guests use these values for? Are they fixed at boot?
> > >>
> > >> Only Windows guests use it so it's hard to tell. I can only claim that
> > >> if I stick bogus values into that ACPI object the guest fails to read
> > >> the floppy.
> >
> > We discussed this with John a bit on IRC.
> >
> > In my opinion, the real mess in this case is in the ACPI spec itself. If
> > you re-read the _FDI control method's description, the Package that it
> > returns contains *dynamic* geometry data, about the *disk* (not *drive*):
> >
> > - Maximum Cylinder Number // Integer (WORD)
> > - Maximum Sector Number // Integer (WORD)
> > - Maximum Head Number // Integer (WORD)
>
> FWIW, that's not how I read the ACPI specification. I read it as
> saying that the information should be filled with the maximum number
> of CHS that the drive can support. So, even if a smaller disk happens
> to be in the drive the maximum the drive supports would not change.
I agree. It says:
This object returns information about a floppy disk drive. This
information is the same as
that returned by the INT 13 Function 08H on Intel Architecture PCs.
So disk drive, not disk information.
And FWIW I have an old "the undocumented PC" book which says
this about int 13h function 8 (read diskette drive parameters):
"Remember this data is *not* the limits of the media in the drive,
but the maximum capability of the specified drive".
> Also, FWIW, SeaBIOS uses the standard 1.44MB floppy controller timing
> information even if a 5.25 drive is found - as far as I know this
> information is only ever used on PIO to the floppy controller and the
> QEMU floppy controller doesn't care what timing parameters it is
> programmed with.
>
> -Kevin
