On 02/22/2016 11:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 22 February 2016 at 19:11, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: >> On 02/19/2016 10:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> How do you feel about renaming the tcg-target.c files to >>> tcg-target.inc.c ? Then I can make clean-includes know that >>> *.inc.c are not to have the cleaning rules applied to them. >> >> I suppose. Though is the pattern "*.inc.c" really any better >> than "tcg-target.c"? > > I think it's kind of confusing that tcg-target.c isn't a > standalone C file, so giving it a clearer name is nicer > for humans too.
No objection then. r~
