On 19 February 2016 at 20:04, Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> > > Switch to using isyn.swstep.ex to hold the is_ldex state for > SWStep syndrome generation. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com>
What's the rationale for renaming the field? If this is groundwork for something else it might make more sense in a patchset with whatever is going to use this. Or is it just trying to make the swstep handling parallel the dabt syndrome info approach a bit more? thanks -- PMM
