On 02/26/2016 07:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> net_init_tap_one receives in vhostfdname a fd name from vhostfd= or
> vhostfds=, or NULL if there is no vhostfd=/vhostfds=.  It is simpler
> to just check vhostfdname, than it is to check for vhostfd= or
> vhostfds=.  This also calms down Coverity, which otherwise thinks
> that monitor_fd_param could dereference a NULL vhostfdname.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  net/tap.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/tap.c b/net/tap.c
> index cfb6831..cd7a7fc 100644
> --- a/net/tap.c
> +++ b/net/tap.c
> @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static void net_init_tap_one(const NetdevTapOptions *tap, 
> NetClientState *peer,
>          options.backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_KERNEL;
>          options.net_backend = &s->nc;
>  
> -        if (tap->has_vhostfd || tap->has_vhostfds) {
> +        if (vhostfdname) {
>              vhostfd = monitor_fd_param(cur_mon, vhostfdname, &err);
>              if (vhostfd == -1) {
>                  error_propagate(errp, err);
> @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ static void net_init_tap_one(const NetdevTapOptions *tap, 
> NetClientState *peer,
>                         "vhost-net requested but could not be initialized");
>              return;
>          }
> -    } else if (tap->has_vhostfd || tap->has_vhostfds) {
> +    } else if (vhostfdname) {
>          error_setg(errp, "vhostfd= is not valid without vhost");
>      }
>  }

Applied to -net.

Thanks

Reply via email to