On 02/26/2016 07:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > net_init_tap_one receives in vhostfdname a fd name from vhostfd= or > vhostfds=, or NULL if there is no vhostfd=/vhostfds=. It is simpler > to just check vhostfdname, than it is to check for vhostfd= or > vhostfds=. This also calms down Coverity, which otherwise thinks > that monitor_fd_param could dereference a NULL vhostfdname. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> > --- > net/tap.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/tap.c b/net/tap.c > index cfb6831..cd7a7fc 100644 > --- a/net/tap.c > +++ b/net/tap.c > @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static void net_init_tap_one(const NetdevTapOptions *tap, > NetClientState *peer, > options.backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_KERNEL; > options.net_backend = &s->nc; > > - if (tap->has_vhostfd || tap->has_vhostfds) { > + if (vhostfdname) { > vhostfd = monitor_fd_param(cur_mon, vhostfdname, &err); > if (vhostfd == -1) { > error_propagate(errp, err); > @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ static void net_init_tap_one(const NetdevTapOptions *tap, > NetClientState *peer, > "vhost-net requested but could not be initialized"); > return; > } > - } else if (tap->has_vhostfd || tap->has_vhostfds) { > + } else if (vhostfdname) { > error_setg(errp, "vhostfd= is not valid without vhost"); > } > }
Applied to -net. Thanks