On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 07:00:27PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I'm still not sure users actually need this. I am inclined to think we > > should teach guests to respond to NEED_RESET status. Then to handle > > disconnect, we would > > - deactivate the disconnected backend > > - stop VM, and wait for a reconnect > > - set NEED_RESET status, and re-activate the backend > > after guest reset > > Sorry your answer came late, so my reply too ;). It may depend on the > use case, what I suggest wouldn't need to stop the VM, but merely set > the link-down status. Furthermore, how do you disconnect/deactivate > the backend cleanly? Having an explicit message for that and document > it may make things easier. > > It has been a while I haven't looked at vhost-user, so I am short of > details, but I rebased this series, if there is still interest. I'll > send a RFCv2, there are a couple of worthy fixes to pick from that. > > thanks
OK, sure. Let's split this up: fixes, then new features. > -- > Marc-André Lureau
