On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:19:44AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 08.03.2016 um 09:22 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben: > > Same arguments as for PATCH 2, except here an argument on the maximum > > length of subqdict would probably be easier. > > Yes, these are constant string literals in all callers, including the > one non-test case in quorum. > > Let's simply assert a reasonable maximum for subqdict_length. The > minimum we need to allow with the existing callers is 9, and I expect > we'll never get keys longer than 16 characters.
Hi, Kevin, Markus, The patch should be trying to do as mentioned above. To make it clearer, how about the following one: diff --git a/qobject/qdict.c b/qobject/qdict.c index 9833bd0..dde99e0 100644 --- a/qobject/qdict.c +++ b/qobject/qdict.c @@ -704,17 +704,16 @@ int qdict_array_entries(QDict *src, const char *subqdict) for (i = 0; i < INT_MAX; i++) { QObject *subqobj; int subqdict_entries; - size_t slen = 32 + subqdict_len; - char indexstr[slen], prefix[slen]; + char indexstr[128], prefix[128]; size_t snprintf_ret; - snprintf_ret = snprintf(indexstr, slen, "%s%u", subqdict, i); - assert(snprintf_ret < slen); + snprintf_ret = snprintf(indexstr, ARRAY_SIZE(indexstr), "%s%u", subqdict, i); + assert(snprintf_ret < ARRAY_SIZE(indexstr)); subqobj = qdict_get(src, indexstr); - snprintf_ret = snprintf(prefix, slen, "%s%u.", subqdict, i); - assert(snprintf_ret < slen); + snprintf_ret = snprintf(prefix, ARRAY_SIZE(prefix), "%s%u.", subqdict, i); + assert(snprintf_ret < ARRAY_SIZE(prefix)); subqdict_entries = qdict_count_prefixed_entries(src, prefix); if (subqdict_entries < 0) { Two assertions on the snprintf_ret should make sure we are safe, right? Thanks. Peter