Hi On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > I didn't do this now, because one, I'm not aware of a system that needs > it, and two, ivshmem is Linux-specific anyway. ivshmem-plain could be > made more portable, and once that's done, memory-backend-shm might > become useful.
How is ivshmem (the "plain" part) Linux-specific? Afaik it works on bsd too. > That leaves permissions. You're right, the patch changes them from 0777 > to 0644. I'm inclined to call it a bug fix. I failed to mention it in > my commit message, and I'll fix that. We may want to mention it in > release notes, too. That's good enough for me. -- Marc-André Lureau