On 14.03.2016 17:56, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> 
> The masks weren't chosen nor applied properly. The architecture specifies
> that writes to AMR are masked by UAMOR for PR=1, otherwise AMOR for HV=0.
> 
> The writes to UAMOR are masked by AMOR for HV=0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> [clg: fixed gen_spr_amr() call in init_proc_book3s_64()]
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@fr.ibm.com>
> ---
>  target-ppc/translate_init.c | 78 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> index c921d9f53984..f2eb5f041ecd 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> @@ -1070,30 +1070,72 @@ static void gen_spr_7xx (CPUPPCState *env)
>  
>  #ifdef TARGET_PPC64
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> -static void spr_read_uamr (DisasContext *ctx, int gprn, int sprn)
> +static void spr_write_amr(DisasContext *ctx, int sprn, int gprn)
>  {
> -    gen_load_spr(cpu_gpr[gprn], SPR_AMR);
> -    spr_load_dump_spr(SPR_AMR);
> -}
> +    TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> +    TCGv t1 = tcg_temp_new();
> +    TCGv t2 = tcg_temp_new();
>  
> -static void spr_write_uamr (DisasContext *ctx, int sprn, int gprn)
> -{
> -    gen_store_spr(SPR_AMR, cpu_gpr[gprn]);
> +    /* Note, the HV=1 PR=0 case is handled earlier by simply using
> +     * spr_write_generic for HV mode in the SPR table
> +     */
> +
> +    /* Build insertion mask into t1 based on context */
> +    if (ctx->pr) {
> +        gen_load_spr(t1, SPR_UAMOR);
> +    } else {
> +        gen_load_spr(t1, SPR_AMOR);
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Mask new bits into t2 */
> +    tcg_gen_and_tl(t2, t1, cpu_gpr[gprn]);
> +
> +    /* Load AMR and clear new bits in t0 */
> +    gen_load_spr(t0, SPR_AMR);
> +    tcg_gen_andc_tl(t0, t0, t1);
> +
> +    /* Or'in new bits and write it out */
> +    tcg_gen_or_tl(t0, t0, t2);
> +    gen_store_spr(SPR_AMR, t0);
>      spr_store_dump_spr(SPR_AMR);
> +
> +    tcg_temp_free(t0);
> +    tcg_temp_free(t1);
> +    tcg_temp_free(t2);
>  }
>  
> -static void spr_write_uamr_pr (DisasContext *ctx, int sprn, int gprn)
> +static void spr_write_uamor(DisasContext *ctx, int sprn, int gprn)
>  {
>      TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> +    TCGv t1 = tcg_temp_new();
> +    TCGv t2 = tcg_temp_new();
> +
> +    /* Note, the HV=1 case is handled earlier by simply using
> +     * spr_write_generic for HV mode in the SPR table
> +     */
>  
> +    /* Build insertion mask into t1 based on context */
> +    gen_load_spr(t1, SPR_AMOR);
> +
> +    /* Mask new bits into t2 */
> +    tcg_gen_and_tl(t2, t1, cpu_gpr[gprn]);
> +
> +    /* Load AMR and clear new bits in t0 */
>      gen_load_spr(t0, SPR_UAMOR);
> -    tcg_gen_and_tl(t0, t0, cpu_gpr[gprn]);
> -    gen_store_spr(SPR_AMR, t0);
> -    spr_store_dump_spr(SPR_AMR);
> +    tcg_gen_andc_tl(t0, t0, t1);
> +
> +    /* Or'in new bits and write it out */
> +    tcg_gen_or_tl(t0, t0, t2);
> +    gen_store_spr(SPR_UAMOR, t0);
> +    spr_store_dump_spr(SPR_UAMOR);
> +
> +    tcg_temp_free(t0);
> +    tcg_temp_free(t1);
> +    tcg_temp_free(t2);
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
>  
> -static void gen_spr_amr (CPUPPCState *env)
> +static void gen_spr_amr(CPUPPCState *env, bool has_iamr)
>  {
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>      /* Virtual Page Class Key protection */
> @@ -1101,15 +1143,17 @@ static void gen_spr_amr (CPUPPCState *env)
>       * userspace accessible, 29 is privileged.  So we only need to set
>       * the kvm ONE_REG id on one of them, we use 29 */
>      spr_register(env, SPR_UAMR, "UAMR",
> -                 &spr_read_uamr, &spr_write_uamr_pr,
> -                 &spr_read_uamr, &spr_write_uamr,
> +                 &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_amr,
> +                 &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_amr,
>                   0);
> -    spr_register_kvm(env, SPR_AMR, "AMR",
> +    spr_register_kvm_hv(env, SPR_AMR, "AMR",
>                       SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS,
> +                     &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_amr,
>                       &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_generic,
>                       KVM_REG_PPC_AMR, 0);
> -    spr_register_kvm(env, SPR_UAMOR, "UAMOR",
> +    spr_register_kvm_hv(env, SPR_UAMOR, "UAMOR",
>                       SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS,
> +                     &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_uamor,
>                       &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_generic,
>                       KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR, 0);
>      spr_register_hv(env, SPR_AMOR, "AMOR",
> @@ -8093,7 +8137,7 @@ static void init_proc_book3s_64(CPUPPCState *env, int 
> version)
>      case BOOK3S_CPU_POWER7:
>      case BOOK3S_CPU_POWER8:
>          gen_spr_book3s_ids(env);
> -        gen_spr_amr(env);
> +        gen_spr_amr(env, version >= BOOK3S_CPU_POWER8);
>          gen_spr_book3s_purr(env);
>          env->ci_large_pages = true;
>          break;

I think this last hunk (and thus the "has_iamr" parameter of that
function) rather belong to the next patch, since it is not used here yet.

Apart from that, the patch looks fine to me.

 Thomas



Reply via email to