On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:02 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 16/03/2016 11:49, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > #3 0x00000000800b713e in virtio_blk_data_plane_start (s=0xba232d80) at > > /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c:224 > > #4 0x00000000800b4ea0 in virtio_blk_handle_output (vdev=0xb9eee7e8, > > vq=0xba305270) at /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/hw/block/virtio-blk.c:590 > > #5 0x00000000800ef3dc in virtio_queue_notify_vq (vq=0xba305270) at > > /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:1095 > > #6 0x00000000800f1c9c in virtio_queue_host_notifier_read (n=0xba3052c8) at > > /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:1785 > > #7 0x00000000800f1e14 in virtio_queue_set_host_notifier_fd_handler > > (vq=0xba305270, assign=false, set_handler=false) at > > /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:1817 > > #8 0x0000000080109c50 in virtio_ccw_set_guest2host_notifier > > (dev=0xb9eed6a0, n=0, assign=false, set_handler=false) at > > /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c:97 > > #9 0x0000000080109ef2 in virtio_ccw_stop_ioeventfd (dev=0xb9eed6a0) at > > /home/cborntra/REPOS/qemu/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c:154 > > One bug is here: virtio_ccw_stop_ioeventfd, in this case, should pass > assign=true to virtio_ccw_set_guest2host_notifier. (Assuming my > understanding of assign=true is correct; I think it means "I'm going to > set up another host notifier handler"). Hm... I copied these semantics from virtio-pci, and they still seem to be the same. I wonder why we never saw this on virtio-pci? > In dataplane, instead, all calls to > virtio_queue_set_host_notifier_fd_handler and > virtio_queue_aio_set_host_notifier_handler should have assign=true. The > ioeventfd is just being moved from one aiocontext to another. How can a transport know where they are called from?