Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 03/10/2016 01:22 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> Rather than requiring all flat unions to explicitly create
>>> a separate base struct, we can allow the qapi schema to specify
>>> the common members via an inline dictionary. This is similar to
>>> how commands can specify an inline anonymous type for its 'data'.
>>> We already have several struct types that only exist to serve as
>>> a single flat union's base; the next commit will clean them up
>>> (in particular, the doc change to the BlockdevOptions example in
>>> this patch will be reflected to QMP in the next).
>>
>> The parenthesis is a bit cryptic. "Reflected"?
>
> Maybe s/reflected to/implemented in/ would read better.
What about:
a single flat union's base; the next commit will clean them up.
In particular, this patch's change to the BlockdevOptions example
in qapi-code-gen.txt will actually be done in the real QAPI schema.
[...]
