On 03/27/2016 03:33 AM, Nutan Shinde wrote: > Hi, > > So, this patch won't be considered, because there is already a patch > related to the same issue, right? >
You'd have to follow the other thread to see if the patch was accepted or not. Even if it isn't, etiquette is generally that it'd be rude to not allow them a chance to spin their own v2/revision. So if your patch was sent later than theirs, it's likely this one won't be considered, correct. --js > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:40 PM, John Snow <js...@redhat.com > <mailto:js...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On 03/23/2016 01:30 AM, Nutan Shinde wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > My patch is same as the patch mentioned in the link. I just picked up > > the task from BitSizedTask page, as it was not crossed. > > > > I guess the issue is resolved then, what should I do in this case? > Also, > > please tell me, how do I know which tasks are already taken up? > > > > Regards, > > Nutan Shinde. > > > > In some cases, since GSoC and Outreachy are approaching, a lot of people > are trying to pick off the Bite Sizes Tasks right now. You may do well > by checking > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/threads.html to > make sure that nobody else has submitted a fix for the task you wish > to fix. > > In some cases, fixes may have been submitted recently, but aren't > accepted into QEMU just yet. Searching the list archives will help you > determine which is which. > > Thanks, > --js > >
