> On 04 Apr 2016, at 00:30, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 3 April 2016 at 18:56, Liviu Ionescu <i...@livius.net> wrote: >> well, to summarise, I notified you that in certain conditions, >> due to an non-obvious dependency that does not break the build >> when not met, the existing code crashes at run time with a >> segmentation fault, and I suggested that an assert might help >> developers to save some debugging time. > > Which I completely agree with. If you want to send a patch > to add the assert I'm happy to review it.
I guess the original report was clear enough for an active commiter to easily understand the problem and fix it, in significantly less iterations that I would need to produce a compliant and acceptable patch (reaching this point already took 9 messages). :-( regards, Liviu
