On 04/04/2016 10:10, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > This will be fixed by Cornelia's rework, and is an example of why I > > think patch 1/9 is a good idea (IOW, assign=false is harmful). > > So what do we want to do for 2.6? The aio handler rework (without the > cleanup) is needed. Do we want to include the minimal version of my > "keep handler assigned" patch (the one without the api rework) as well, > as it fixes a latent bug?
I would, but Michael is more conservative in general. Since the difference between a bug and a feature is very fuzzy here, I would just omit my patch 9. Paolo
