On 04/04/16 17:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> ... My question is, do we need the "opt/" prefix at all (for the future, >> i.e., the non-historical cases)? >> Looking at the last discussion, I >> believe we converged on: >> >> - QEMU devs (future filenames): org.qemu/... >> - users: com.my_company/... >> - QEMU fw devs (future names): org.tianocore.edk2.ovmf/... >> org.seabios/... >> - QEMU fw devs hacking: <root-prefix-to-strip>/... >> >> Did you find something unsafe about this (necessitating "opt/")? >> > > The reason to use the opt/ prefix is to avoid warning > with QEMU 2.4 and 2.5.
Sorry, it's been a long day :), and I don't understand your answer. Can you please spell it out for me? How are QEMU 2.4 and 2.5 related to this discussion? Thanks! Laszlo
