On 15/04/16 09:48, Aleksandar Markovic wrote: > Agreed. This looks much better, and is simpler and faster. Though, it looks > to me that "fst" should be called "status" instead (just not to break > consistency throughout SoftFloat library and in other places of assigning > name "status" to the last argument of any function if its type is > float_status*). If you agree, I am going to replace name "fst" with name > "status" in the code that you provided, otherwise as-is.
Yes, "status" will be fine. Leon
