On 21/04/16 17:57, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> From: Sergey Fedorov <serge.f...@gmail.com>
>
> This patch series consists of various general TCG clean-up patches extracted
> from Paolo's MTTCG tree [1] and Alex's MTTCG base enablement tree [2]. I also
> add here a patch from myself to rework tb_invalidated_flag based on the 
> Paolo's
> "tcg: move tb_invalidated_flag to CPUState" patch from the original verions of
> this series. Another patch of mine cleans up from a misleading 'next_tb'
> variable.
>
> The main idea is to review and merge these patches separately from the MTTCG
> series to cut the latter and make it easier to review.
>
> The series' tree can be found in a public git repository [3].
>
> [1] https://github.com/bonzini/qemu/tree/mttcg
> [2] https://github.com/stsquad/qemu/tree/mttcg/base-patches-v2
> [3] https://github.com/sergefdrv/qemu/tree/tcg-cleanup-v4
>
> Summary of changes:
>  v4:
>   * Add a patch to clean up from 'next_tb' [PATCH v4 4/6]
>  v3:
>   * Add a patch to rework tb_invalidated_flag from myself [PATCH v3 4/4]
>  v2:
>   * Complete code_bitmap elimination [PATCH v2 1/3]
>   * Take Alex's version of tb_find_physical() reorganization [PATCH v2 2/3]
>   * Drop [PATCH 3/5] completely
>   * Drop [PATCH 4/5] and [PATCH 5/5] for separate series
>   * Take Alex's rebase of Paolo's icount code eliding [PATCH v2 3/3]
>
> Alex Bennée (1):
>   tcg: reorganize tb_find_physical loop
>
> Paolo Bonzini (2):
>   tcg: code_bitmap is not used by user-mode emulation
>   cpu-exec: elide more icount code if CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>
> Sergey Fedorov (2):
>   tcg: Clean up from 'next_tb'
>   tcg: Rework tb_invalidated_flag
>
>  cpu-exec.c              | 132 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  include/exec/exec-all.h |   2 -
>  include/qom/cpu.h       |   2 +
>  tcg/tcg.h               |  19 +++----
>  tci.c                   |   6 +--
>  trace-events            |   2 +-
>  translate-all.c         |  16 +++---
>  7 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>

Ping. I'm going to make a v5 including a patch proposed in [1] by
tomorrow. So if anyone has thought of something to comment before that,
just let me know :)

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-04/msg03336.html

Kind regards,
Sergey

Reply via email to