On 29 April 2016 at 15:31, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: > Is it a bug of the system headers? Or simply a design which > requires users to be careful when including certain header files? > > Both /usr/include/xfs/xfs_fs.h and /usr/include/linux/fs.h define > the same struct fsxattr, and both definitions are identical.
That sounds like a header bug to me... http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2016-02/msg00324.html suggests that (a) the xfsprogs folks are updating their header to deal with what the kernel header is doing and that (b) they think the distros ought to be updating both of them in sync in some way... > Of course a good comment would be helpful here, e. g. > > # Avoid redefinition of struct fsxattr in xfs/xfs_fs.h. > # It is already defined in linux/fs.h. Yes, this is really all I want: a note that some versions of the kernel headers and the xfs headers clash, so we suppress the xfs version if the kernel header is providing the struct. thanks -- PMM
