On 5 May 2016 at 11:38, 赵小强 <zxq_yx_...@163.com> wrote: > At 2016-03-29 15:47:19, "xiaoqiang zhao" <zxq_yx_...@163.com> wrote: >>This patch set trys to QOM'ify hw/char files, see commit messages >>for more details >> >>Changes in v2: >>* rename TYPE_SCLP_LM_CONSOLE to TYPE_SCLPLM_CONSOLE which is suggested by >> Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> >>* rebase on the current master >> >>xiaoqiang zhao (6): >> hw/char: QOM'ify escc.c >> hw/char: QOM'ify etraxfs_ser.c >> hw/char: QOM'ify lm32_juart.c >> hw/char: QOM'ify lm32_uart.c >> hw/char: QOM'ify sclpconsole-lm.c >> hw/char: QOM'ify sclpconsole.c >> >> hw/char/escc.c | 12 +++++------- >> hw/char/etraxfs_ser.c | 11 +++++------ >> hw/char/lm32_juart.c | 9 +++------ >> hw/char/lm32_uart.c | 12 +++++------- >> hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c | 14 +++++++++----- >> hw/char/sclpconsole.c | 12 ++++++++---- >> 6 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) >> >>-- >>2.1.4 >> > > ping ???
I think you will have better luck if you rearrange all these QOM patches so that you provide them as one series per board or per target architecture, not one per type of device. There is no single person with responsibility for "all of hw/char" so structuring your cleanup patchsets like this will tend to result in the people who might care about the devices not looking at them. (Also you can concentrate on the devices which are actively maintained, like ARM ones, x86 ones, MIPS and SPARC ones, rather than the oddballs semi-orphaned ones like lm32, CRIS, etc.) thanks -- PMM
