On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2016-05-05 05:25, Peter Xu wrote: > > Previously, there are lots of VT-d hooks in common codes (like q35, > > ioapic, etc.). A better way is to avoid using VT-d interfaces. Also, we > > can start to abstract some common functions between Intel and future AMD > > IOMMU device. > > Just don't introduce the VT-d variants in the first place. Will also > shorten your patch series again.
Yes, I can do that. After waiting for some more review comments and making sure this is the correct way to go, I can do the re-arrangement in next version. Thanks, -- peterx
