On Tue, 05/10 10:33, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Fair enough. My series didn't have a separate callback, but with yours > that should be working. > > So is the semantics of .bdrv_inactivate() basically "bdrv_flush, and I > really mean it"?
Yes. > > > > Maybe we need something like an "active reference counter", and we > > > decrement that for all children and only call their .bdrv_inactivate() > > > when it arrives at 0. > > > > That should work, but the effect of the counters are local to one > > invocation of > > bdrv_inactivate_all(), and is not really necessary if we do as above. > > Agreed. Working on another version now. Fam
