From: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>

Similar to the "!drv || !drv->bdrv_aio_ioctl" case above, here it is
okay to set co.ret and return. As pointed out by Paolo, a BH will be
created as necessary by the caller (bdrv_co_maybe_schedule_bh).
Besides, as pointed out by Kevin, "data" was leaked before.

Reported-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20160601015223.19277-1-f...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
---
 block/io.c | 20 ++------------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index a2fba67..6070e77 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -2327,19 +2327,6 @@ int bdrv_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t 
sector_num, int nb_sectors)
     return rwco.ret;
 }
 
-typedef struct {
-    CoroutineIOCompletion *co;
-    QEMUBH *bh;
-} BdrvIoctlCompletionData;
-
-static void bdrv_ioctl_bh_cb(void *opaque)
-{
-    BdrvIoctlCompletionData *data = opaque;
-
-    bdrv_co_io_em_complete(data->co, -ENOTSUP);
-    qemu_bh_delete(data->bh);
-}
-
 static int bdrv_co_do_ioctl(BlockDriverState *bs, int req, void *buf)
 {
     BlockDriver *drv = bs->drv;
@@ -2357,11 +2344,8 @@ static int bdrv_co_do_ioctl(BlockDriverState *bs, int 
req, void *buf)
 
     acb = drv->bdrv_aio_ioctl(bs, req, buf, bdrv_co_io_em_complete, &co);
     if (!acb) {
-        BdrvIoctlCompletionData *data = g_new(BdrvIoctlCompletionData, 1);
-        data->bh = aio_bh_new(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs),
-                                bdrv_ioctl_bh_cb, data);
-        data->co = &co;
-        qemu_bh_schedule(data->bh);
+        co.ret = -ENOTSUP;
+        goto out;
     }
     qemu_coroutine_yield();
 out:
-- 
2.5.5


Reply via email to