Am 06.07.2010 17:19, schrieb Markus Armbruster: > Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> writes: > >> Am 06.07.2010 15:53, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>> On 07/06/2010 08:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>>> Am 06.07.2010 15:26, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >>>> >>>>> On 07/05/2010 09:05 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:45:23 +0200 >>>>>> Juan Quintela<quint...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> - 0.13 release >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I was hoping to do -rc0 before the holiday but that didn't happen so I'm >>>>> working on it now. Figure release is ~1 week from -rc0. >>>>> >>>> What does this mean for patches that should go into 0.13 and aren't >>>> strictly bug fixes? When should the pull request be sent latest? >>>> >>> >>> Last week? >> >> Sure, but it didn't happen then and things have moved forward. >> >>> I'd really like to put out -rc0 today and I'm trying to free up time to >>> get through the backlog of patches to make that happen. I just pushed >>> your latest pull. If you've got another pull request ready send it >>> now. But I can't promise that I'll take anything that hasn't already >>> shown up. >> >> I'm just reviewing and merging v2 of Markus' block fixes/cleanups and >> I'm considering the Sheepdog block driver (which seems to have had >> enough iterations and doesn't touch a single line of code outside its >> own file). > > Any chance to get the next series (Split ide-drive and scsi-disk qdevs, > and more) as well? 1-3/8 are bug fixes, and 4/8 removes unreliable > information from info block; wanted in .13. 5-8/8 could be punted to > .14.
If it's purely bug fixes, I think we can still take it after -rc0. Kevin