Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Fix confusing argument names of do_unaligned_access() functions

[Sergey Sorokin]

What if I combine both patches into single one?

10.06.2016, 19:33, "Peter Maydell" <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>:
> On 10 June 2016 at 17:26, Sergey Sorokin <afaral...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>  There are functions cpu_unaligned_access() and do_unaligned_access() that
>>  are called with access type and mmu index arguments. But these arguments
>>  are named 'is_write' and 'is_user' in their declarations.
>>  The patch fixes the names to avoid a confusion.
>>
>>  Signed-off-by: Sergey Sorokin <afaral...@yandex.ru>
>
> If we're going to touch all of these then we have an enum type
> we should be using instead of just 'int' for the old
> is_write argument: MMUAccessType (defined in cpu-common.h).
>
> thanks
> -- PMM