Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:29:47PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > Use Coccinelle script to replace 'ret = E; return ret' with >> > 'return E'. The script will do the substitution only when the >> > function return type and variable type are the same. >> > >> > Sending as RFC because the patch looks more intrusive than the >> > others. Probably better to split it per subsystem and let each >> > maintainer review and apply it? >> >> As far as I'm concerned, obvious mechanical cleanups like this one can >> go in as a single tree-wide patch. I'd consider making you split it up, >> then chase maintainers a waste of your time[*]. > > Not wasting my time sounds like a good idea. :) > > Once the issues below are fixed and Eric's comments are > addressed, should it go through your error reporting tree?
Yes.