On 06/24/2016 07:45 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 24.06.2016 um 00:37 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: >> It makes more sense to have ALL block size limit constraints >> in the same struct. Improve the documentation while at it. >> >> Simplify a couple of conditionals, now that we have audited and >> documented that request_alignment is always non-zero. > > Now you mention in the commit message that request_alignment is always > non-zero and this is supposedly documented... > >> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> >> > >> @@ -324,6 +324,12 @@ struct BlockDriver { >> }; >> >> typedef struct BlockLimits { >> + /* Alignment requirement, in bytes, for offset/length of I/O >> + * requests. Must be a power of 2 less than INT_MAX. A value of 0 >> + * defaults to 1 for drivers with modern byte interfaces, and to >> + * 512 otherwise. */ >> + uint32_t request_alignment; > > ...but you didn't actually change the documentation.
Oops. Blame late night patch editing :) > > This is the only problem I saw in this series, so if you post a new > version of the comment, I can change it while applying the series. /* Alignment requirement, in bytes, for offset/length of I/O * requests. Must be a power of 2 less than INT_MAX; defaults to * 1 for drivers with modern byte interfaces, and to 512 * otherwise. */ -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature